prodchem
Aug 25, 2026
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) entered 2026 with a much larger project pipeline than it had a few years ago. But the market is increasingly revealing a difficult reality: announced capacity is growing faster than projects are reaching final investment decision (FID), construction and operation.
The problem is not that carbon capture technology has stopped developing. Instead, developers are confronting high capital costs, uncertain carbon economics, permitting delays, infrastructure gaps and weaker policy support in some major markets. Recent project cancellations and delays suggest that the industry is entering a period of selective investment rather than broad-based expansion.
Global CCS development has expanded substantially, with hundreds of projects at different stages of development. Yet the projects furthest from construction face the greatest risk of being delayed or cancelled.
The International Energy Agency has long highlighted that early-stage CCUS projects have a higher probability of delay or cancellation, particularly where projects depend on new transport and storage infrastructure or enhanced-oil-recovery economics. (IEA)
That distinction is becoming increasingly important in 2026.
A project being announced does not mean that the required capital has been committed. For investors and industrial buyers, the relevant hierarchy is:
Announced → feasibility → permits → offtake → FID → construction → commissioning → operating
The further a project is from FID, the greater the execution risk.
Europe provides one of the clearest examples of the problem.
Research from the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis found that new CCS project announcements in Europe have fallen sharply over the past three years, while a series of cancellations in 2025 highlighted the economic and technical barriers to reaching FID. IEEFA expects continued weakness in new announcements and FIDs, together with additional cancellations. (IEEFA)
The issue is particularly important for industrial clusters.
Carbon capture is most economical when multiple emitters can share CO₂ pipelines, transportation systems and storage sites. But those systems require large upfront investments before enough emitters are connected.
This creates a classic infrastructure problem:
No capture projects without transport and storage → no transport infrastructure without sufficient capture volumes → difficult financing without both.
The US has developed one of the world's largest carbon-management project pipelines, supported by federal incentives and tax credits.
However, policy uncertainty has become an important investment variable.
In 2025, the US Department of Energy cancelled 24 clean-energy demonstration projects, including carbon-capture and industrial decarbonization projects, representing more than $3.7 billion in previously awarded funding. (carbon-pulse.com)
For developers, the lesson is straightforward: government support can materially improve the economics of first-of-a-kind CCS projects, but changes in policy can also undermine investment assumptions.
This is particularly important for projects whose financial models depend on long-term incentives rather than conventional commercial revenues.
One of the clearest 2026 examples is Air Products's decision to abandon its Louisiana Clean Energy Complex.
The proposed multibillion-dollar project combined blue hydrogen production with carbon capture. Air Products ultimately cited challenging commercial conditions, project-specific economics and slower-than-expected market development. Construction costs had reportedly increased substantially from the original estimate. (New Orleans CityBusiness)
The cancellation illustrates a central weakness in the CCS business model:
Technology can work technically while the overall project fails economically.
For investors, rising construction costs can overwhelm the value of emissions reductions, especially when the project does not have sufficiently strong offtake or policy support.
The chemicals industry is particularly exposed because many decarbonization projects require large amounts of capital while competing in globally traded commodity markets.
Dow's decision to delay its flagship Path2Zero project in Alberta is an important example. S&P Global describes the two-year delay as part of a broader CCUS market recalibration amid weak chemical-market conditions and capital conservation. (S&P Global)
The significance extends beyond Dow.
For chemical producers, CCS must increasingly compete with other uses of capital:
New production capacity
Plant maintenance
Energy efficiency
Electrification
Renewable power
Recycling and circularity
Debt reduction
Shareholder returns
When commodity margins are weak, a large CCS investment can become difficult to justify unless it simultaneously protects the competitiveness of the underlying asset.
Carbon capture is often discussed as if the main challenge is installing capture equipment.
In reality, a full CCS chain requires:
Capture → compression → gathering → pipeline/ship transport → storage → monitoring
Every stage introduces capital requirements, operating costs and regulatory risks.
A technically successful capture facility therefore has little value if there is no commercially available storage site or transportation network.
This is one reason industrial clusters are attracting attention. Shared infrastructure can spread the cost across multiple emitters rather than forcing every company to build its own complete CCS chain.
CO₂ storage capacity is not necessarily the fundamental global constraint—the challenge is developing permitted, financeable and accessible storage capacity in the right locations.
Europe is trying to build cross-border CO₂ transport and storage networks, while countries such as Canada and the US are developing regional hubs.
But permitting, land access, community acceptance and regulatory responsibility remain important barriers. The Global CCS Institute highlighted infrastructure development, community acceptance and regulatory alignment as continuing challenges for CCS deployment in 2026. (Global CCS Institute)
The result is that a project may have a capture technology and a willing industrial operator but still be unable to proceed because the downstream CO₂ infrastructure is not ready.
Canada's Pathways Alliance illustrates another version of the problem.
The country's major oil producers are now targeting a late-2027 FID for their large-scale carbon-capture network. The project was originally targeting 22 million tonnes of annual emissions reductions by 2030 but has been scaled back to around 6 million tonnes by the mid-2030s, with additional capacity planned later. (Reuters)
The delay shows how large shared infrastructure projects can take years to align:
Industry commitments + government fiscal terms + regulatory approvals + transport infrastructure + storage + financing.
For investors, that extended timeline increases the importance of policy durability.
The 2026 pipeline suggests five recurring causes.
CCS projects can require billions of dollars before generating conventional revenue. Cost inflation and engineering complexity can quickly weaken project returns.
A project needs a sufficiently valuable emissions-reduction incentive—through carbon pricing, tax credits, contracts or other mechanisms—to justify its cost.
Industrial customers may support decarbonization in principle but hesitate to sign contracts that significantly increase the cost of their products.
Capture facilities need pipelines, terminals and storage sites. Delays anywhere in the chain can delay the entire project.
Changes in subsidies, carbon prices or government priorities can materially change project economics.
The industry is therefore moving toward a more demanding investment test.
A credible CCS project increasingly needs:
Low capture cost + secure storage + transport access + policy support + strong industrial offtake + manageable construction risk.
Projects that lack several of these characteristics are more likely to remain in the announcement pipeline.
This is creating a widening gap between theoretical CCS capacity and financeable CCS capacity.
The slowdown does not mean CCS is becoming irrelevant.
For sectors such as cement, chemicals, refining and some hydrogen production, carbon capture can remain one of the few technologies capable of delivering deep emissions reductions without completely replacing the underlying industrial process.
But the market is becoming more selective about where CCS makes economic sense.
The strongest projects are likely to be located where:
emissions are concentrated;
storage is nearby;
infrastructure can be shared;
carbon incentives are durable;
products have sufficient margins; and
customers value lower-carbon production.
The most important shift is therefore not simply the number of projects being delayed.
It is the transition from pipeline growth to pipeline selection.
During the previous phase, developers could announce projects based on long-term decarbonization ambitions. In the current phase, projects increasingly have to demonstrate that they can survive real-world capital and operating economics.
The cancellation of Air Products' Louisiana project, Dow's Path2Zero delay and the slower progress of major European and Canadian initiatives all point toward the same conclusion: CCS projects need stronger commercial foundations before they can scale. (New Orleans CityBusiness)
2026 is shaping up to be a stress test for carbon capture investment.
The technology itself is advancing, and governments continue to view CCS as important for difficult-to-abate industries. But the industry's enormous announced pipeline is unlikely to translate entirely into operating capacity.
The next winners will probably be projects that can demonstrate bankable economics rather than simply large capture volumes.
For chemical and energy companies, this means CCS investment decisions should increasingly be assessed through the same framework used for other major capital projects: expected returns, construction risk, infrastructure availability, regulatory durability and customer willingness to pay.
The central question for the sector is no longer "How much CO₂ can we capture?"
It is:
"Which carbon-capture projects can actually afford to be built?"
Featured Product
Found this useful?
Continue Reading
China's rapid expansion of ethylene, polyethylene and polypropylene capacity is increasing global supply, pushing utilization rates and margins lower while driving Chinese producers toward larger export markets.
Wood Mackenzie expects global petrochemical capacity growth to slow after 2026, but higher utilization, stronger margins, falling inventories and fewer new projects will be key indicators of whether a genuine demand-led recovery has arrived.
The long awaited REACH revision, originally promised for February 2025
